Yearly "Booster" Vaccinations - Are They Good For Your Cat?

The practice of pet vaccinating took hold in theit was assumed it was because the vaccine didn't
1950's."take"). Based on this, in 1959 it was
Introducing any kind of drug onto the market forrecommended to do yearly shots.
humans involves quite an extensive amount ofNow to be fair, at the time, there was no known
regulations including varying levels of testing.risk... but then there wasn't really any testing... you
Pets?... well they're generally tested UPON ratherdon't find what you're not looking for. This
than tested for.practice went on unquestioned for decades.
There are industry advisory groups that "suggest"In 1992 Dr. Ron Schultz, a veterinary immunologist
certain practices and protocols but there's veryand professor at University of Wisconsin published
little in the way of regulation. That's been madean article with co-author Dr. Phillips in Current
more obvious with commercial pet food over theVeterinary Therapy. They called into question the
past few years. But the practice of vaccinatingpractice of yearly vaccination arguing that (a)
remains fairly cloaked in mystery and secrecy.vaccines produce antibodies; (b) the antibodies
As is true with what you feed your specialinterfere with subsequent vaccines.
companion, the vaccination choices you make canAdditionally, there have been studies by Dr.
dramatically effect their health and behavior.Schultz and numerous other Vets that show not
Did you ever wonder why you - the human - getonly are yearly re-vaccinations unnecessary, but in
vaccinated once for most things whereas petsfact they're responsible for a dramatic increase in
get yearly "boosters"?diseases our pets suffer today including: Allergies,
You'd think there was a rational, scientific reason.Arthritis, Autoimmune Haemolytic Anaemia,
Nope.Cancer, Epilepsy, Inflammatory Bowel disease,
Why Yearly Vaccination?Thyroid disease as well as a number of behavioral
Vaccinations started with puppies... for distemperissues.
and adenovirus. Early vaccinations showed aboutThrough the efforts of Dr. Schultz and other Vets
one third of puppies didn't have measurableworldwide yearly re-vaccination is no longer
antibodies in their blood for distemper a year later.considered necessary and does in fact subject
(There are reasons why this can be the case, butpets to unneccessary risk.