| Over a short length, the cables don't make a | | | | leave people confused just like the poor fellow in |
| difference. What is different is that in the case of | | | | the commercial. |
| the component cables, the TV has to convert the | | | | Component video is based on an analog format. |
| component analog signal to digital. In the case of | | | | With analog signals, the voltage signal on the wire |
| the HDMI cable, the signal is already digital. So | | | | is in a wave format and how the wave changes |
| there may be a perceptible difference if the TV | | | | in height is what is important. Theoretically it has |
| doesn't do the conversion well. | | | | an infinite number of values between zero and |
| Putting aside picture quality, the reason you should | | | | the maximum, somewhat like the variable |
| use the HDMI cable is that it carries the HDCP | | | | windshield wipers I had on an old Thunderbird. |
| signals, component does not. If the source device, | | | | With the HDMI or DVI format, these are based |
| say a cable box, looks for the HDCP handshake, | | | | on digital signaling. Digital as you probably have |
| and doesn't get it, it Will not output an HD signal. | | | | heard, uses ones and zeros with a series of |
| So if you want to watch HBO in HD from a cable | | | | pulses all at the same height and they are either |
| box, you have to use HDMI or DVI. | | | | present or missing. At the other end, processing |
| I use the component cables. Then again, I spent | | | | equipment reassembles the information. In a 4-bit |
| about $60 on them (gold plated ends, large | | | | binary coding, you can have 1 of 16 different |
| conductors, thick shielding, etc) for both the video | | | | values as 4 1's and 0's assembled as a group can |
| components and audio channels. And, I bought | | | | have 16 different combinations. So equipment at |
| them a few years ago, before HDMI cables were | | | | the other end of the cable that is detecting signals |
| even around. The difference in performance | | | | and looking for analog sine waves would put out |
| between top-end component video cables and | | | | total gibberish if it just received pulses of 1's and |
| HDMI cables is negligent. But, if you just use | | | | 0's. |
| standard RCA cables - like the cheap ones the | | | | Some solutions are very easy. If an HDMI or DVI |
| cable TV company gives you - you won't get as | | | | output is available on both boxes, use those. The |
| good of quality as the HDMI cables. | | | | difference between DVI and HDMI is that HDMI |
| As HDMI cable connections become more and | | | | caries the audio in addition to the video signals. But |
| more widely used, we are often asked: which is | | | | DVI is just as good and other than the expense |
| better, HDMI or component video? The answer, | | | | of an extra audio cable, that will solve your |
| as it happens, is not cut-and-dried. | | | | problem. If you were trying to use the |
| First, one note: everything said here is as | | | | Component outputs because you already had the |
| applicable to DVI as to HDMI; DVI appears on | | | | HDMI port tied up, they make HDMI switch boxes |
| fewer and fewer consumer electronic devices all | | | | that are fairly inexpensive where you can plug |
| the time, so isn't as often asked about, but DVI | | | | multiple HDMI cables in on one side with one |
| and HDMI are essentially the same as one | | | | output on the other. |
| another, image-quality-wise. The principal | | | | Via component cables an analog signal is |
| differences are that HDMI carries audio as well as | | | | transfered. HDMI is digital. Among other things this |
| video, and uses a different type of connector, but | | | | has the following advantage: As long as the data |
| both use the same encoding scheme, and that's | | | | is transferred correctly you have the perfect |
| why a DVI source can be connected to an HDMI | | | | image data arriving at your TV. There won't be a |
| monitor, or vice versa, with a DVI/HDMI cable, | | | | single pixel difference in what the 'sending' device |
| with no intervening converter box. | | | | puts out and what reaches your TV. Component |
| The upshot of this article--in case you're not | | | | signals (as all analog signals) can vary in quality and |
| inclined to read all the details--is that it's very hard | | | | you can get disturbances. |
| to predict whether an HDMI connection will | | | | So actually: At first glance HDMI cables might |
| produce a better or worse image than an analog | | | | appear more expensive than component cables, |
| component video connection. There will often be | | | | but that's not entirely true. For HDMI the |
| significant differences between the digital and the | | | | requiered quality of the cable is related to the |
| analog signals, but those differences are not | | | | length you need. If you only need to cover a |
| inherent in the connection type and instead | | | | short distance (two or three meters) a cheap |
| depend upon the characteristics of the source | | | | cable will give you the best possible result that |
| device (e.g., your DVD player) and the display | | | | could ever be achieved by any means ... it's digital |
| device (e.g., your TV set). Why that is, however, | | | | ... the cheap cable has no influence on the image |
| requires a bit more discussion. | | | | quality ... just like the network cable your |
| Several people a day are searching for an | | | | computer uses to hook up to the inet has no |
| interconnection solution by trying to connect HDMI | | | | influence on the image quality of videos you |
| to Component outputs through a cable for their | | | | download / stream. |
| high-definition equipment. Unfortunately, this isn't a | | | | Of course this doesn't mean component is bad: |
| matter of rearranging wires and having the right | | | | Among affordable analog video connections it's |
| type of connector. There is a fundamental analog | | | | probably by far the best, but HDMI just has the |
| versus digital incompatibility problem similar to the | | | | advantage of not having to care about the signal |
| upcoming digital broadcast TV switchover versus | | | | being unintentionally "affected" by outside |
| your current rabbit ears that receive analog | | | | influences during transfer. So if you can: HDMI is |
| broadcast signals. They aren't compatible and | | | | the better choice. |